![]() ![]() THQ has the right to use Condit's likeness. Fair Use: I see very little room to argue that THQ's use is not fair use. On ownership of the copyright, I think the artist wins, hands down.īut, that doesn't mean that he wins the case.Ģ. Therefore, I can't take a copy of that tattoo and make posters of it. Ownership of the copyright: If the tattoo artist designed the tattoo and did not sign a "work for hire" agreement, then the copyright in the tattoo is, presumptively, his intellectual property. Nothing in this statement is false, but that doesn't mean that this gets you to the correct answer. Thus, claims Escobedo in the lawsuit, he remains the owner of the copyright over the image he drew. "In reality, the owner of the tattoo artwork is the creator of the work, unless there is a written assignment of the copyright in the tattoo art." Escobedo and Condit never had a written agreement. "People often believe that they own the images that are tattooed on them by tattoo artists," explains Speth. at 16.) He claims that by using the work in a video game, depicting Carlos Condit, THQ infringed upon his copyright in the work.Ī press release issued by the firm representing the artist, Christopher Escobedo, states: ![]() The inmost light tattoo registration#( Complaint at 12.) The artist alleges that he created the original design, and owns a registration for the copyright to the design. The artist tattooed a lion on fighter Carlos Condit's torso, and claims that it was his original creation. ![]() A tattoo artist sued THQ, Inc., the makers of an Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) themed video game, for copyright infringement. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |